United States v. Blue Diamond Coal Company, Scotia Coal Company
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ENGEL, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal we are required to consider whether the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures extends to the warrantless seizure of statutorily required records from the office of a. coal mine company where they were located on a table and open to inspection.
We reverse the district court judgment suppressing the records and directing their return to the coal mine operator.1 In so doing, we recognize that the mine industry is a highly regulated one and that a businessman in such an industry, in accepting the burdens as well as the benefits…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. Thomas M. AcklenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Kalmas v. WagnerWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Artes-Roy v. AspenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Dow Chemical Co. v. US, by and Through GorsuchDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1982
- Reed v. SchneiderDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.