Legal Opinion

Struble v. Van Blarcom

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 5, 1941No. Docket 129/173PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In this suit to construe a will as modified by two codicils, the sole question is as to the disposal of the residuary estate. In the will, bequests were made among others to six named individuals in various amounts. The residuary clause provided that the residuary estate should be distributed among these particular six legatees in such proportions as the amount hereinbefore bequeathed to each of said legatees bears to the total amount of the residue.

By the first codicil three of these six bequests were revoked and the other three were left unchanged so that the legatees became Sarah Struble…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Maxwell v. MaxwellNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937
  2. Central Hanover Bank, C., Co. v. BramanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
  3. Aikman v. ArmstrongNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1913

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Herbert v. Central Hanover Bank Trust Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
  2. Kennedy v. MocklerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API