Legal Opinion

Rudensey v. Hoffman

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 12, 1935Published

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

The judge of the First District Court of the city of Newark, sitting without a jury, gave judgment in favor of the defendant in an action wherein plaintiff sought to recover from the defendant on a check of $194 given by the defendant to the plaintiff. Plaintiff appeals and argues two points grounded in the specification of determinations, namely, that there was no' evidence to support the court’s finding and that the court erred in an evidence ruling. A third point, listed as the second in the brief, appears to be without foundation in the specification of determinations.

Defendant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sheehan v. MenkesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API