Legal Opinion

Sheehan v. Menkes

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 19, 1930PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Cueiam.

This appeal brings np a judgment of the First District Court of Jersey City in favor of plaintiff-respondent and against defendant-appellant in the sum of $214.20. The action was brought against one George Menkes and appellant H. J. Heinz & Company, to recover for injuries to respondent's tooth and dental bridgework by biting on an iron bolt which was in a mince pie baked by Menkes and purchased from him by respondent, the- mincemeat being sold by appellant H. J. Heinz & Company to Menkes.

The testimony was that Menkes purchased the mincemeat in bulk from Heinz; that he carefully…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cassini v. Curtis Candy Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  2. Quinn v. Swift & Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Corin v. S. S. Kresge Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1932
  4. Slavin v. Francis H. Leggett & Co.United States District Court · 1934
  5. Rudensey v. HoffmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API