Legal Opinion

United States v. Braunstein

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 26, 1947PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEDINA, District Judge.

The United States has brought suit for breach of a contract whereby defendants, it is said, agreed to buy from it 9599 twenty-five pound boxes of raisins unfit for human consumption which could be converted into alcohol. The parties have stipulated that an interchange of telegrams, hereinafter referred to, constitutes the contract, if there was one, that furnishes> the foundation for the suit. Defendant Sidney Braunstein asserts this interchange of telegrams did not create a contract, and moves for summary judgment.

On July 21, 1945 the Commodity Credit Corporation, an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Iselin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Payne v. Utah-Idaho Sugar Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Candland v. OldroydUtah Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wagner v. Rainier Manufacturing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Leonard v. Pepsico, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
  3. Beech Aircraft Corp. v. Flexible Tubing Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1967
  4. Thrift Shop, Inc. v. Alaska Mutual Savings BankAlaska Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Minar v. SkoogSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API