Westerdale v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtBobins, J.
The appellant, Clyde Westerdale, was found guilty by a jury in the lower court of the offense of removing property subject to a lien with the intent to defraud the holder of the lien, and has appealed from a judgment entered on this verdict.
The Attorney General challenges the validity of the bill of exceptions embraced in the transcript in this case on the ground that it was not filed within the time fixed by the court. No error is shown in any part of the record not embraced in the bill of exceptions, so that, if, by reason of the invalidity of the bill of exceptions, we are precluded from…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Boatright v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
- Austin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
3Cited by3 opinions
- Royal v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
- Cain v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
- Caldwell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943