Legal Opinion

Austin v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 16, 1931PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

There appears in the record what purports to be an agreed bill of exceptions which contains a notation signed 'by the prosecuting attorney as follows: “0. K. as an abstract of the testimony in the above case so far as I am able to remember.” This cannot be considered upon appeal for two reasons: In the first place, it was not filed with the clerk within the time allowed by the court for filing a bill of exceptions. In the second place, it is still necessary that the trial judge sign the bill of exceptions in a felony case before it can be admitted as a part of the record upon appeal. Ward v.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ward v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. West v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  2. Boatright v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
  3. French v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  4. Chandler v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  5. Westerdale v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API