Legal Opinion

United States v. One Parcel of Property Located at Shelly's Riverside Heights Lot X

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 5, 1994No. Civ. A. 1:CV-93-598PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

CALDWELL, District Judge.

We are considering the Government’s motion for reconsideration of our Memorandum and Order of May 5, 1994. We exercise jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331.

I. Facts

We recounted the facts in some detail in our earlier Memorandum and Order. Thus, we will recount them only briefly and refer to them in greater detail as needed during our analysis. See United States v. One Parcel of Property Located at Shelly’s Riverside Heights, 851 F.Supp. 633 (M.D.Pa.1994) (Caldwell,' J.). This case revolves around a 10-acre tract of land in Mifflin County, Pennsylvania, on…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. United States v. JacobsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Geraghty & Miller, Inc. v. Conoco Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API