Legal Opinion
United States Department of Transportation Ex Rel. Arnold v. CMC Engineering
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 5, 2009No. 07-1617PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FUENTES, Circuit Judge:
In this qui tam action, filed by August Arnold, the Relator alleges that the Defendants, consultants who provided services to the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (“PennDOT”), falsified their credentials to qualify for higher pay rates. Arnold contends that, as a result, the consultants defrauded the federal government, which funded the contracts at issue, in violation of the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3729. On motions to dismiss, the District Court concluded that claims presented to state agencies that disburse federal funds are…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Wilkerson v. New Media Technology Charter School Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Allison Engine Co. v. United States Ex Rel. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Rainwater v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States Ex Rel. Totten v. Bombardier Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States ex rel. Spay v. CVS Caremark Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Boone v. MOUNTAINMADE FOUNDATIONDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Kolar v. Preferred Real Estate Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Ke v. Association of Pennsylvania State College & University FacultiesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- United States Department of Transportation Ex Rel. Arnold v. CMC EngineeringCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.