Legal Opinion

United States Department of Transportation Ex Rel. Arnold v. CMC Engineering

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 2, 2014No. 13-2759UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHWARTZ, Circuit Judge.

In this qui tam action under the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3729, relator August W. Arnold asserts that the District Court improperly granted summary judgment against him on his claim that CMC Engineering, Inc. (“CMC”) submitted false claims for payment to the federal government via the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (“Penn-DOT”) for the services of inspectors who worked on highway projects. Arnold claims that the inspectors who worked on the projects did not have the qualifications that entitled them to the pay rates claimed. Because the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rockwell International Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Cherie Hugh v. Butler County Family YmcaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  3. Allison Engine Co. v. United States Ex Rel. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. United States Ex Rel. Wilkins v. United Health Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  5. United States Ex Rel. Burlbaw v. OrenduffCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Spay v. CVS Caremark Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  2. United States ex rel. Grupp v. DHL Express (USA), Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2014
  3. United States v. NEARYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API