Legal Opinion

State v. Payano-Roman

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided May 10, 2005No. 2004AP1029-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEDEMEYER, PJ.

¶ 1. Tomas R. Payano-Roman appeals from a judgment entered after he pled guilty to one count of possession of heroin, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 961.41(3g)(a)2 (2003-04). He claims the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress. Because there is insufficient evidence in the record to support the trial court's determination that the laxative treatment administered to Payano-Roman was motivated out of medical necessity for his well-being, we reverse.

I. BACKGROUND

¶ 2. On April 12, 2002, Milwaukee Police Officers Corey Parker and Scott Stiff were conducting surveillance near…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. California v. AcevedoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. United States v. Montoya De HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Wilson v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Winston v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. Payano-RomanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. Payano-RomanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. Payano-RomanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API