Legal Opinion

State v. Payano-Roman

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 2006No. 2004AP1029-CRPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnn Walsh Bradley, J.

¶ 1. The petitioner, State of Wisconsin, seeks review of a published court of appeals' decision that reversed a judgment convicting Tomas Payano-Roman of possession of heroin.1 The State asserts that the court of appeals erred in overturning the circuit court's determination that the administration of a laxative to Payano-Roman was not a government search subject to the Fourth Amendment. It further asserts that, even if administration of the laxative was a government search, the search was reasonable.

¶ 2. We determine that the administration of the laxative that resulted in the recovery of a…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. United States v. Montoya De HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Winston v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. PostWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Clifford George v. Thomas EdholmCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. State v. Cassius A. FosterWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. Andy J. ParisiWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  5. State v. Jessica M. RandallWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API