State v. Payano-Roman
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAnn Walsh Bradley, J.
¶ 1. The petitioner, State of Wisconsin, seeks review of a published court of appeals' decision that reversed a judgment convicting Tomas Payano-Roman of possession of heroin.1 The State asserts that the court of appeals erred in overturning the circuit court's determination that the administration of a laxative to Payano-Roman was not a government search subject to the Fourth Amendment. It further asserts that, even if administration of the laxative was a government search, the search was reasonable.
¶ 2. We determine that the administration of the laxative that resulted in the recovery of a…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Montoya De HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Winston v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. PostWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
- Clifford George v. Thomas EdholmCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- State v. Cassius A. FosterWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. Andy J. ParisiWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. Jessica M. RandallWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.