Chatkin v. Talarski
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The appellant defendant is entitled to none of the corrections sought in the finding, which contains the following material facts: The defendants for nineteen years had owned the property known as 108 Governor Street in Hartford, where the defendant Peter conducted an undertaking business, and he was solely responsible for the care of the walk and steps leading to the undertaking parlor utilized therein. The building was a one-story structure with several steps leading to the front entrance. It had a flat roof, under the eaves of which was a conductor pipe with holes in it from which water…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Reardon v. ShimelmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Lisa v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
3Cited by1 opinion
- Perl v. Cohodas, Peterson, Paoli, Nast Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1940