Legal Opinion

Elliott v. Rosenberg

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 19, 1885PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to the St. Louis Circuit Court, Adams, J.

1Opinion of the CourtRombauer, J.

This is an action to recover the amount due for goods-sold and delivered by plaintiff to the firm of Gr. L. & S. B. Altheimer, of which firm defendant is charged to have-been a general partner at the date of the sale. The cause was submitted to the court on the following stipulation, signed by counsel: “It is stipulated herein that the only issue to be contested is whether or not defendant, Rosenberg, is liable as a general partner in firm of Gr. L. &> 5. B. Altheimer, for the debt in suit; and if the court shall find that said Rosenberg is liable as general partner, then judgment shall be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Greenabaum v. MillsapsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wilkerson v. Corrigan Consolidated Street Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Ayer v. MoonOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Dawson v. PogueOregon Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Grabill v. BeardenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API