Legal Opinion

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Winkfield

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 2001No. 00-1138PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

In February 1997, the family of Frederick E. Lowery retained respondent Lawrence Edward Winkfield of Columbus, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0034254, and paid him a retainer of $7,000 to investigate and, if possible, obtain postconviction relief for Lowery. Lowery was convicted in 1993 of aggravated robbery. Respondent told the family that he would charge $150 an hour against the retainer and discussed with them the options of supershock probation and a motion to reconsider. Respondent did not deposit the retainer in a separate trust account.

The potential remedies respondent discussed with…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. WinkfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. WinkfieldOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. FreemanOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Columbus Bar Assn. v. WinkfieldOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. MeyerOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Columbus Bar Assn. v. Winkfield (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API