Legal Opinion

Adams v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided November 2, 1984No. 82-CV-1443PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER

McCURN, District Judge.

The present action was brought under sections 205(g) and 1631(e)(3) of the Social Security Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3), to review the Secretary of Health and Human Services’ (Secretary) final determination terminating claimant’s supplemental security income (SSI) benefits. This court held in claimant’s favor and remanded the action to the Secretary for calculation of benefits. Presently before the court is claimant’s motion for attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1). For the reasons discussed below the court finds…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hornal v. SchweikerDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1982
  2. Marguerite B. Reid v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  3. Vaughn v. CalifanoDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1977
  4. Dolin v. HarrisDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1980
  5. Franklin v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Randolph McCarthy Jr. v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (85-1401), State of Michigan, Department of Social Services, Vanburen County (85-1402)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  2. Losco v. BowenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  3. Howard v. BowenDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
  4. Mary Alice Galbreath v. Otis R. Bowen, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  5. Mullanix v. HecklerDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API