Legal Opinion
Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Gurian
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 15, 1934No. 3087PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PELPHREY, Chief Justice.
The statement of the nature and result of the suit appearing in appellant’s brief being agreed to by appellee as substantially correct, will be used by us. It reads:
“Statement of the Nature and. Result of the Suit.
“This suit was filed by plaintiff in the District Court of Crane Coujity, Texas, on September 30, 1933, in which plaintiff alleged that on or about August 21, 1932, while riding one of appellant’s freight trains out of the town of Big Spring, Howard County, Texas, he was ordered by the special agent to get off the train, and that after he had alighted he was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gattegno v. ParisianTexas Commission of Appeals · 1982
- Psimenos v. HuntleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- T. & P. R'y Co. v. O'DonnellTexas Supreme Court · 1882
- Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. SloanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Peoples National Bank v. MulkeyTexas Supreme Court · 1901
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dallas Railway & Terminal Company v. GossettTexas Supreme Court · 1956
- International-Great Northern R. v. AckerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Sharpe v. MunozCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
- Frost National Bank of San Antonio v. KaytonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- McMurrey Corp. v. YawnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.