Legal Opinion

Succession of Harkins

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 15, 1847PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Claiborne, Taylor, J.

1Opinion of the Court

The judgment of the court was pronounced by

Slidell, J.

In April, 1845, feeder, as administrator of Harkins, :filed -an account of his administration. He states payments of several claims made -by him, and a mortgage claim held by himself individually for $6,240 and.interest, evidenced by the notes of the deceased, and a mortgage executed by him in feeder’s favor. He also gives the estate credit for various sums of money and notes received by him from.sales .-of property of the succession, stating the whole amount of notes, cash, and assets that have come into his hands at $5,850. Ho alleges…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ferraro v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  2. Miguez v. DelcambreSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
  3. Jacobs v. WeissingerMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Deshotels v. LafleurSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
  5. Succession of Preston v. BradySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API