Legal Opinion

In re Doll

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 17, 1891PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Petition for writ of habeas corpus.

1Opinion of the CourtGileillan, C. J.

This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus requiring the managers and superintendent of the state reformatory at St. Cloud, Stearns county, in this state, to produce before this court Joseph Doll, who, upon an indictment and conviction of a criminal offence, was sentenced by the district court in Otter Tail county to be confined in said reformatory. No proof or evidence is offered, nor is it suggested, that there is not in Stearns county a court or officer authorized to grant the writ, or, if there is, that he has refused to grant it, or is absent or incapable of acting.

This raises…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Carruth v. TaylorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
  2. State ex rel. Murphy v. WolferSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  3. Wojahn v. HalterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  4. State Ex Rel. Alexander v. RiggSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API