Legal Opinion

United States v. Hemmer

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided March 27, 1912No. 573PublishedCited by 8 opinions

In Equity. Suit by the United States against Louis Hemmer, William W. Fletcher, J. E. Peart, the Richards Trust Company, the Iowa & Dakota Land Company, Fred D. Henderson, as treasurer of Moody County, S. D., E. A. Hornby, as Auditor of said county, Job Robinson, S. W. Ballard, and L. W. Ballard, copartners as Ballard & Son, and Moody County, S. D. On final hearing.

1Opinion of the Court

ELLIOTT, District Judge.

This action was brought by the United States of America, complainant, against the defendants above named, by the United States district attorney for the District of South Dakota, pursuant to instructions of the Attorney General of the United States.

The complainant states its cause of action in its complaint filed herein, in substance, after the formal portions, as follows:

It is alleged; That Henry H. Taylor, sometimes known and designated Henry Taylor, was, and during all the times named in the complaint was, a Sioux Indian of the full blood, belonging to and a member…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Tiger v. Western Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. United States v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. United States v. FreemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  4. United States v. HealeySupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. United States v. FinnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1902

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. United States v. JoyceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917
  3. Brown v. MinshallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Wollmer v. WoodNebraska Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Robinson v. SteeleWashington Supreme Court · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API