Legal Opinion

Lawrence v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 21, 1992No. 91-139PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Chief Judge:

Appellant James Lawrence appeals his conviction by a jury of possession with intent to distribute cocaine, D.C. Code § 33-541(a)(l) (1988 Repl.), contending that the trial judge erred by instructing the jury that appellant was charged with two counts from different indictments. In view of the proffers before the trial judge and in the absence of any facial inconsistency between the indictments or a request under Super.Ct.Crim.R. 6(e), we find no abuse of discretion by the trial judge in consolidating the indictments. Appellant’s other contentions, that there was…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Turner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. United States v. Jack Moody Stricklin, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  5. United States v. Rojas-ContrerasSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Medrano-Quiroz v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Griggs v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Owens v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. James v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API