Legal Opinion

Chase v. Gregory

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1935No. Docket No. 96, Calendar No. 38,265PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

Defendants, Arnold and Margaret Gregory, gave their promissory note for $500 to defendants, Clark and Amelia Gregory, payable 12 months after date. Before maturity the payees for valuable consideration negotiated the note to plaintiff, Samuel Chase, who resides in the State of New York. Arnold Gregory is the son of Clark Gregory. As the result of some business transactions between these two men prior to the maturity of the note, Arnold paid his father the face of the note, but not the accrued interest. The makers of the note claim, and the undisputed testimony tends to show, that payment of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hotchin v. SecorMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Brown v. DunckelMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Riverside Iron Works v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Sage v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Ellis v. BallouMichigan Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Tulsa Tribune Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
  2. Haggerty v. MacGregorMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Slaughter v. Philadelphia National BankDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Lent v. DickinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API