Hines v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAIRD, Justice (Assigned).
Appellant was charged by indictment with the offense of aggravated kidnaping. Tex. Pen.Code Ann. § 20.04. A jury convicted appellant of the charged offense and assessed punishment at 27 years confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice — Institutional Division. The first point of error contends the evidence is legally insufficient to support the jury’s verdict. We agree and, therefore, reverse and order an acquittal.
I. Factual Summary.
When resolving a legal sufficiency challenge, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution.…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- City of Garland v. Dallas Morning NewsTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. RieweCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- State v. MorenoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hines v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Reyes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Megas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002
- Carlton Lamar Grant v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2024
- Crenshanda Williams v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.