Legal Opinion

Martin v. Soblotney

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 14, 1982No. 537PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHERTZ, Judge:

Appellants George Martin (husband Appellant) and La-Verne R. Martin (wife Appellant) were injured in a two-car accident which occurred when the vehicle operated by Appellee crossed over Pennsylvania Route 51 onto Appellants’ side of the road and struck the vehicle being operated by husband Appellant. Appellants thereupon brought this action under Section 301(a)(5) of the Pennsylvania No-Fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act 1 (No-fault Act). ■ Husband Appellant sought damages under Section 301(a)(5)(B) and wife Appellant, although pleading a cause of action under Sections…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Atkins v. Urban Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Kravinsky v. GloverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Pew TrustSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. Reardon v. MeehanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Martin v. SoblotneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Geyer v. SteinbronnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Hoffman v. Memorial Osteopathic HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Dudash v. DudashSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API