Chittick v. Thompson Hill Development Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Motion for reargument denied. The following phrase in the opinion* “ indexing is no part of the record ” is incorrect. (Real Prop. Law, § 316.)† The laches of the moving party, however, preclude the granting of a reargument; the reason given for failing to move in accordance with rule 19‡ being insufficient to warrant this court in disturbing the decision heretofore made. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Carswell, Seudder and Davis, JJ.
See 230 App. Div. 410, 414.— [Rep.
Amd. by Laws of 1924, chap. 582.— [Rep.
See App. Div. Rules, 2d Dept, rule 19.— [Rep.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Chittick v. Thompson Hill Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
3Cited by4 opinions
- Camfield v. Luther Forest Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. Levine-RodriguezNew York Supreme Court · 1991
- Henrietta Building Supplies, Inc. v. RogersNew York Supreme Court · 1983
- Camfield v. Luther Forest Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1979