Legal Opinion

Chittick v. Thompson Hill Development Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 15, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Motion for reargument denied. The following phrase in the opinion* “ indexing is no part of the record ” is incorrect. (Real Prop. Law, § 316.)† The laches of the moving party, however, preclude the granting of a reargument; the reason given for failing to move in accordance with rule 19‡ being insufficient to warrant this court in disturbing the decision heretofore made. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Carswell, Seudder and Davis, JJ.

See 230 App. Div. 410, 414.— [Rep.

Amd. by Laws of 1924, chap. 582.— [Rep.

See App. Div. Rules, 2d Dept, rule 19.— [Rep.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chittick v. Thompson Hill Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Camfield v. Luther Forest Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  2. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. Levine-RodriguezNew York Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Henrietta Building Supplies, Inc. v. RogersNew York Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Camfield v. Luther Forest Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1979