Legal Opinion

Bohm v. DMA Partnership & Home Real Estate, Inc.

Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decided February 29, 2000No. A-99-148PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Seevers, Judge.

David and Julie Bohm brought an action to recover water damage repair costs they incurred on two pieces of residential property they purchased from DMA Partnership (DMA), through DMA’s agent, Home Real Estate, Inc., Grand Island (Home). The Bohms claimed that DMA and Home failed to provide a disclosure statement as required by Neb. Rev. Stat. § 76-2,120 (Reissue 1996), and as a result, they suffered financial injury when they had to repair undisclosed water drainage and damage problems. DMA and Home demurred, claiming that there was a misjoinder of parties and that the Bohms…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. BurlisonNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Burnham v. BennisonNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Lackman v. RousselleNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Woods v. PenceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  5. Larson v. MarshNebraska Supreme Court · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fuller v. CrostonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Pepitone v. WinnNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Burgess v. MillerNebraska Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Hutchison v. KulaNebraska Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Bazar v. Department of Motor VehiclesNebraska Court of Appeals · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API