Legal Opinion

Krenger v. Pennsylvania R.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided December 16, 1947No. C. 7898PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAYFIEL, District Judge.

We will call the case of 'Clyde W. Krenger against The Pennsylvania Railroad Company.

Any motions ?

Mr. Blank: If your Honor please, at this time, sir, the plaintiff respectfully moves under Rules 12(b, c, d, and f), and Rules 56(a and c), of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.CA. following section 723c, to strike Paragraphs IV to VIII, inclusive, from this defendant’s answer upon the ground that that separate defense does not state facts sufficient to constitute a defense at law, and upon the further ground that the defenses sought to be alleged in those…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clark v. LowdenDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1942
  2. Detwiler v. LowdenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  3. Herrington v. ThompsonDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1945
  4. Sherman v. Pere Marquette Ry. Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1945

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Krenger v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  2. Grand Trunk Western Railroad v. BoydMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Cullinan v. New York Cent. R. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948
  4. Krenger v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API