Legal Opinion

Wren v. Bohannon

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 25, 1953No. 12506PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment which denied appellant, Wren, all recovery on his suit which alleged, fraud and in which he sought cancellation of certain instruments by which appellant conveyed a cotton gin to appellees Bohannon and Snow, in consideration of certain vendor’s lien notes secured by a canning plant.

During March of 1951 appellant, W. H. Wren, as s.eller entered into a written contract with appellee Bohannon, by the terms of which Wren agreed to sell to Bohannon a cotton gin situated in Hidalgo ¡County. Bohannon agreed to pay Wren $20,000 in cash and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bridger v. . GoldsmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Rothstein v. Janss Investment Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Moore v. BeaklexTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
  4. J. C. Corbin Co. v. PrestonOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Tips v. BarneburgCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Howe & WiseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  2. National Automobile & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Allco Insurance AgencyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  3. Wink Enterprises, Inc. v. DowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API