Wren v. Bohannon
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
POPE, Justice.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment which denied appellant, Wren, all recovery on his suit which alleged, fraud and in which he sought cancellation of certain instruments by which appellant conveyed a cotton gin to appellees Bohannon and Snow, in consideration of certain vendor’s lien notes secured by a canning plant.
During March of 1951 appellant, W. H. Wren, as s.eller entered into a written contract with appellee Bohannon, by the terms of which Wren agreed to sell to Bohannon a cotton gin situated in Hidalgo ¡County. Bohannon agreed to pay Wren $20,000 in cash and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bridger v. . GoldsmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Rothstein v. Janss Investment Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1941
- Moore v. BeaklexTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
- J. C. Corbin Co. v. PrestonOregon Supreme Court · 1923
- Tips v. BarneburgCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Houston v. Howe & WiseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
- National Automobile & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Allco Insurance AgencyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Wink Enterprises, Inc. v. DowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973