Resto v. Superior Court

ON RECONSIDERATION

Petitioner moves for reconsideration of our decision of June 3 of the current year denying the petition for cer-tiorari. She bases her motion on the ground that said petition raises a question which is novel in our jurisdiction, to wit: That the insurance company is liable for interest, as to the amount in excess of the policy coverage, which accrued on the total amount of the judgment while its appeal was *2pending. In support of her contention she cites the doctrine laid down in the texts of Couch, Cyclopedia of Insurance Law, Yol. 7, pp. 6264 and 6265, and Appleman,…