Legal Opinion

Lantz v. Bowman

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1994No. 93-252PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Justice.

Appellant James M. Lantz appeals from the district court’s order which set aside an entry of default against Appellee Linda S. Bowman.

We affirm.

Issue

Lantz states the issue on appeal as follows:

1. Did the trial [cjourt abuse it[ ]s discretion in setting aside the Entry of Default entered against Respondent?

Facts

Lantz and Bowman divorced in New Mexico in 1986, and Bowman received primary custody of the parties’ minor children. Lantz filed a petition in the Wyoming district court on August 18, 1993, to change custody, time sharing, and child support. When Lantz filed his petition,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Vanasse v. RamsayWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Amernational Industries, Inc. v. Action-Tungsram, Inc., ElectroexportimportCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  3. Spitzer v. SpitzerWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Lake v. LakeWyoming Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Owens v. OwensCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. M & a Construction Corp. v. Akzo Nobel Coatings, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Esquibel v. EsquibelWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Crews v. ShofnerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API