Legal Opinion

Bainbridge v. Hoes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 15, 1914PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, without costs, upon the opinion of William Allaire Shortt, referee. It may be that the plaintiff has some remedy against the administrator upon contract. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Rich and Stapleton, JJ., concurred.

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pikeville Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  2. In re the Estate of LudlamNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  3. People v. Continental Casualty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Bacal v. National City BankCity of New York Municipal Court · 1933
  5. In re the Estate of HeaneyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API