Kramarski v. Board of Trustees of Orland Park Police Pension Fund
Appellate Court of Illinois
1DissentJustice R.E. Gordon
I must respectfully dissent.
First, we must both enforce the Illinois Pension Code (Code) as written and liberally construe the Code in favor of those to be benefit-ted. Hahn v. Police Pension Fund, 138 Ill. App. 3d 206, 211 (1985). To properly enforce the Code, we must give the Code its plain and ordinary meaning. People v. Pack, 224 Ill. 2d 144, 147 (2007). Section 3 — 114.2 of the Code states a police officer is entitled to a not-on-duty disability pension if he or she “becomes disabled as a result of any cause other than the performance of an act or duty, and who is found to be physically…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Abrahamson v. Illinois Department of Professional RegulationIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Marconi v. Chicago Heights Police Pension BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
- Drezner v. Civil Service CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1947
- Aguilera v. Mount Sinai Hospital Medical CenterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- People v. PackIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.