Legal Opinion

Leduc v. . Moore

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1892PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Civil actioN, tried at April Term, 1892, of FrankliN Superior Court, Bryan, J., presiding. The case is stated in the opinion. The defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Shepherd, J.:

James I. Moore executed a promissory note to E. F. Moore, who, for value, and before maturity, endorsed it, for his own benefit, to the plaintiff bank. The said E. F. Moore was the president of the bank, and he, together with the cashier, by the custom of the bank, alone constituted its discount committee. The said Moore actually participated as a member of such committtee in the discounting of said note. The question presented, is whether the bank is affected with notice of any defence existing in favor of the maker as against the payee at the time or before notice of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commercial Bank v. BurgwynSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Goldstein v. Union National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Bowen v. Mount Vernon Sav. BankCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  3. In Re ParmalatDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  4. McKenney v. EllsworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Brite v. . PennySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API