Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Skinner v. Superior Court of Santa Clara Cty.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 22, 1977No. Docket Nos. 40390, 40391PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ELKINGTON, J.

The People of the State of California, represented by the Santa Clara County District Attorney, commenced two actions against petitioners Philip D. Skinner and James B. Hunt. Each action concerned a separate parcel of improved real property. Their stated purposes were “to enjoin, abate and prevent a nuisance as defined in Chapter 3, Article 2, beginning with Section 11225 of the California Penal Code and commonly referred to as the Red Light Abatement Law, and to protect the public from unlawful, unfair and fraudulent business practices [Civ. Code, §§ 3369, subd. 5,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Randone v. Appellate DepartmentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. People Ex Rel. Busch v. Projection Room TheaterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. People v. BergerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. People v. MitchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Signal Hill v. OwensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API