Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Vencel

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 17, 1992No. 47A04-9108-CV-273PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONOVER, Judge.

Defendants-Appellants Horace R. and Helen P. Campbell (Campbells) appeal the entry of summary judgment and damages in favor of Plaintiff-Appellee Steve Vencel (Venecel) for the Campbells breach of a real estate listing contract with Vencel, a real estate broker.

We reverse.

The issues presented by this appeal are:

1. whether the Campbells were fraudulently induced to enter into the listing contract by broker Vencel, and

2. whether the Campbells entered into it by mistake.

The court sua sponte determines another issue must be discussed, namely:

3. whether Vencel is entitled to recover…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Plymale v. UprightIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. L.S. Ayres Company v. HicksIndiana Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Big Creek Stone Co. v. SewardIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Coldwell Banker & Company v. Merlin KarlockCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  5. White v. WhiteIndiana Supreme Court · 1935

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Walker v. CampbellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Bishop v. SandersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Campbell v. VencelIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Campbell v. VencelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Walker v. CampbellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API