Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Berry

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 20, 1932No. 2923PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, Judge

Except as hereinafter related, Jardine, whose name appears in the caption in the relation of an appellee, is not a party to the appeal before us, and the issue upon the merits of the four interferences involved is solely between Nelson and Berry.

A series of interferences were declared by the proper tribunals of the United States Patent Office between respective applications of different parties for patents, the subject matter of which, generally stated, was alleged improvements in pistons composed in part of aluminum alloy.

In two of these interferences, viz, Nos. 53856 and 55250, Jardine was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sharon v. TerryU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1888

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cleveland Trust Co. v. BerryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938
  2. Bakelite Corporation v. National Aniline & Chem. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  3. Syracuse Washing Mach. Corp. v. VieauCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  4. Adams and Wakefield v. WolinskiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
  5. Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products v. Von Drehle CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API