Legal Opinion
Syracuse Washing Mach. Corp. v. Vieau
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 7, 1934No. 339PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWAN, Circuit Judge.
As a result of an interference proceeding (No. 54,654) in the Patent Office between Walter A. Papworth, one of the plaintiffs, and Harold F. Yieau, one of the defendants, priority of invention was awarded to Yieau by the Examiner of Interferences, and his decision was affirmed by the Board of Appeals. The losing party did not appeal to the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals (35 USCA § 59a), but’ filed the present bill in equity. The other plaintiff, Syracuse Washing Machine Corporation (whose corporate name is now Easy Washing Machino Corporation) is…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Dowling v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- Bernardin v. NorthallU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1897
- MacGregor v. ChesterfieldDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1929
- McKnight v. Metal Volatilization Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1904
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Abbott v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Parker Rust-Proof Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- United States Ex Rel. White v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- Wettlaufer v. RobinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- Galena Manufacturing Co. of Illinois v. Superior Oil WorksCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.