Legal Opinion

Becker v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided December 8, 1993No. 92-3153PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.

The issue on appeal is whether State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company properly refused to renew a Basic Medicare Supplement Policy previously sold to Arthur F. Becker. The circuit court ruled that State Farm's original sale of the policy to Becker violated the provisions of Wis. Adm. Code sec. Ins 3.39(25)(b), which bars the sale of a medicare supplement policy if the effect is to provide the insured with more than one such policy. Because the administrative rule was not yet in effect when the *708sale occurred, we reverse the order and remand with directions to enter judgment for Becker.

T…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. First National Leasing Corp. v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Vollmer v. LuetyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Waukesha County Department of Social Services v. C.E.W.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Reserve Life Insurance v. La FolletteCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982
  5. Rockline, Inc. v. Wisconsin Pysicians Service InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. WeiherCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  2. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. WeiherCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API