Legal Opinion · Dissent

Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. Weiher

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 1, 2015No. 14-3098Published

1DissentLoken, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent. Based upon the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s controlling decision in Fox v. Catholic Knights Ins. Soc’y, 263 Wis.2d 207, 665 N.W.2d 181 (2003), I conclude the majority has misinterpreted Wis. Stat. § 631.11(3), a statute that does not even apply to the issue whether Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company is entitled to rescind the disability insurance policy it issued to Douglas Weiher.

*401I.

In mid-2009, with his income from the practice of dentistry increasing, Weiher advised his independent insurance agent that he would like to increase the monthly disability benefits…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fox Ex Rel. Fricker v. Catholic Knights Insurance SocietyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Tory A. Hall v. Life Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  3. Langlois v. Wisconsin National Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Dr. Martin Manzella, Jr. v. The Paul Revere Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  5. Struebing v. American InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API