Legal Opinion

Lalakea v. Baker

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1958No. 4047PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs-appellants in the above-entitled case filed a motion to strike the answering brief of defendants-appellees, or designated portions thereof, upon the ground of failure thereof to comply with the rules of this *617Supreme Court, particularly Rule 3. Plaintiffs-appellants also, with permission, filed a brief, “PART I” of which is in support of the motion and “PART IP’ thereof is designated their closing brief.

G. Nils Tavares and Edward Berman for plaintiffs-appellants, for the motion (also on the reply brief; Edward Berman on the opening brief.). Morio Omori and A. William Barlow for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Territory of Hawaii ex rel. County of Maui v. HowellHawaii Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lalakea v. BakerHawaii Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API