Baker Hughes, Inc. v. S & S Chemical, LLC
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT HOLMES BELL, District Judge.
This is a trade secret case filed pursuant to Michigan’s Uniform Trade Secrets Act, Mich. Comp. Laws § 445.1902. The matter is presently before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 28). Plaintiffs have filed a Response JECF No. 41), to which Defendants have filed a Reply (ECF No. 45) and Plaintiffs have filed a Sur-Reply (ECF No. 53). For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant in part and deny in part Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss.
I
Defendant Stevens was an employee of the Petrolite Corporation, predecessor to Plaintiff Baker…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Center for Bio-Ethical Reform, Inc. v. NapolitanoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re Lamictal Indirect Purchaser & Antitrust Consumer LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2016