Legal Opinion

Baker Hughes, Inc. v. S & S Chemical, LLC

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided October 24, 2014No. 1:14-CV-531PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBERT HOLMES BELL, District Judge.

This is a trade secret case filed pursuant to Michigan’s Uniform Trade Secrets Act, Mich. Comp. Laws § 445.1902. The matter is presently before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 28). Plaintiffs have filed a Response JECF No. 41), to which Defendants have filed a Reply (ECF No. 45) and Plaintiffs have filed a Sur-Reply (ECF No. 53). For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant in part and deny in part Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss.

I

Defendant Stevens was an employee of the Petrolite Corporation, predecessor to Plaintiff Baker…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Center for Bio-Ethical Reform, Inc. v. NapolitanoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Lamictal Indirect Purchaser & Antitrust Consumer LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API