Ellis v. Board of State Auditors
Michigan Supreme Court
Mandamus by Adolphus A. Ellis to compel the board of state auditors to take the steps necessary to arrive at a just and equitable settlement of the claim of the State against relator for an excess of salary received by him, pursuant to a joint resolution of the legislature.
1Opinion of the CourtHookee, J.
At the spring election in 1891, an amendment to the Constitution increasing the salary of the attorney general was submitted to the electors. The -vote was canvassed, and the amendment was declared to be carried. Similar action was had relative to another amendment submitted in 1893. Salaries were paid at the increased rate, until a recanvass, in obedience to the order of this court, resulted in the determination and declaration that the respective amendments had been defeated. Relator alleges that meantime, believing said amendments to have been legally adopted, he, in good *530faith, received…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Bayne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Hunter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
- People ex rel. Ambler v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Heald v. Polk CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Lamar Township v. City of LamarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
- State v. WeatherbySupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
- State v. YoungSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Chrysler Light & Power Co. v. City of BelfieldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
- County of Norfolk v. CookMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.