Geiger v. First-Troy Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Troy
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HICKS, Circuit Judge.
A motion to dismiss the amended bill was sustained, and plaintiff appealed. The point of the motion is that the facts as stated in the amended bill' are not sufficient to entitle the plaintiff to any relief. The matter must be determined upon a consideration of Equity Rule 25, clause 3, making a bill in equity sufficient which “contains a short and simple statement of the ultimate facts upon which the plaintiff asks relief,” and that portion of Equity Rule 29 requiring that “every defense in point of law arising upon the face of the bill * * * for * * * insufficiency of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Townsend v. VanderwerkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Kansas v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Fechteler v. Palm Bros. & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
- London & San Francisco Bank, Ltd. v. Dexter Horton & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1903
- Conway v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Southern Ry. Co. v. HusseyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
- Spears v. SpearsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
- Interstate Cotton Oil Refining Co. v. Refining, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 1938
- Rozelle v. QuinnDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1942
- Geiger v. First Troy Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of TroyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.