Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Bennett v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1933No. Docket No. L.A. 13874Published

1Concurrence

LANGDON, J., Concurring.

I concur in the conclusion reached in this opinion, but I think it should do expressly what it does in effect; namely, overrule the case of Stone v. Superior Court, 214 Cal. 272 [4 Pac. (2d) 777, 77 A. L. R. 743]. The Stone case is, in its essential features, identical with the instant case, and the present decision destroys the former one as authority. Both are actions to recover money paid as consideration under a contract which was previously rescinded by the aggrieved party, for a ground specified in Civil Code, section 1689. The only difference between them is a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. San Francisco Iron & Metal Co. v. AbrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Stone v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Fair View Farms Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Jensen v. Harry H. Culver & Co.Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1932
  5. Ingalls v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API