Legal Opinion
Benny v. Moberg Welding
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided June 28, 2007No. 26,630PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUSTAMANTE, Judge.
{1} After agreeing to a stipulated compensation order setting a ten percent impairment rating, Jared Benny requested temporary total disability benefits because his medical condition had worsened. His employer, Moberg Welding, objected because Benny had asked for and received a stipulated lump sum settlement pursuant to NMSA 1978, § 52-5-12 (2003). The Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) agreed with the Employer and granted summary judgment in its favor. Benny appeals and we reverse.
{2} The WCJ’s order on Benny’s complaint provides a succinct summary of the course of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Helman v. GallegosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- Draper v. Mountain States Mutual Casualty Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- Leo v. Cornucopia RestaurantNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- Glover v. Sherman Power TongsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
- Cabazos v. Calloway ConstructionNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Guidance Endodontics, LLC v. Dentsply International, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2010
- Holcomb v. RodriguezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016
- Sommerville v. Southwest FirebirdNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
- Fowler v. Vista CareNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
- Santa Fe Water Resource Alliance, LLC v. D'AntonioNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.