Andrews v. Wells
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SPARKS, J.
The question in this appeal is whether a bartender and his employer breached a duty of care by failing to act on an inebriated customer’s request to arrange transportation home. The answer depends on whether they had a duty to act and that in turn depends on whether they had established a special relationship with the customer. Finding no such relationship or duty under the undisputed facts of this case, we affirm the judgment of dismissal.
In this wrongful death action plaintiff Ralph D. Andrews appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of defendants Jim Wells and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Davidson v. City of WestminsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Weirum v. RKO General, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1975
- Williams v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- United States Liability Insurance v. Haidinger-Hayes, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Cory v. ShierlohCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Artiglio v. Corning Inc.California Supreme Court · 1998
- Chelsey Hayes v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Kelly v. Sinclair Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1991
- Jackson v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- Morris v. De La TorreCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.