Legal Opinion

People v. Johnson

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 24, 1970No. Crim. 8166PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SHOEMAKER, P. J.

This is an appeal by defendant Joe Willie Johnson from a judgment convicting him of rape and burglary. His sole contention on appeal is that he had a constitutional right to represent himself at the preliminary hearing and that the denial of this right requires a reversal of the judgment of conviction. The case is one of first impression.

Defendant’s preliminary examination was held in the municipal court on February 4, 1969. At the inception of the hearing, defendant advised the court that he did not desire the services of the public defender and wished to act as his…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Coleman v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. People v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. People v. MaddoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. In Re WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. People v. RuizCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Curry v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. People v. TynerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. People v. EncisoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Fogg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Jones v. CALIFORNIA CASUALTY INDEM. EXCH.California Court of Appeal · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API