United States v. Tiede
United States Court of Berlin
1Opinion of the Court
STERN, Judge **
This is a criminal proceeding arising out of the alleged diversion of a Polish aircraft by the defendants from its scheduled landing in East Berlin to a forced landing in West Berlin. United States authorities exercised jurisdiction over this matter and convened this Court. Court-appointed defense counsel have now moved for a trial by jury. The Prosecution objects, contending that these proceedings are not governed by the United States Constitution, but by the requirements of foreign policy and that the Secretary of State, as interpreter of that policy, has determined that…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Graham v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Reid v. CovertSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Ex Parte MilliganSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Johnson v. EisentragerSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Jean v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Harbury v. DeutchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
- Amparo Cardenas v. William French Smith, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands v. Daniel AtaligCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Catherine Flynn and Ryan Flynn, a Minor, by His Mother Catherine Flynn v. George Shultz, Secretary of State of the United States of America, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.