Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Sorrell

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided January 23, 2018No. 16–P–802Published

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant, Raneek Sorrell, appeals from an order denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea and for a new trial. The defendant argues on appeal, among other things, that the judge erred in denying his motion because there was an insufficient factual basis set forth in his guilty plea for the crime of simple possession of marijuana. We agree and, thus, reverse the order denying the defendant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea and for a new trial.

Background. The defendant was charged with the following: (1) possession of a controlled substance near a school zone, in violation of G. L.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LopezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  2. Commonwealth v. KeefnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  3. Commonwealth v. HartMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  4. Commonwealth v. ArmstrongMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2015
  5. Commonwealth v. LoringMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API