Legal Opinion

Joy v. Little

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 1960No. 10108PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Castles

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the cross-complainants on the pleadings and an order in favor of the cross-complainants striking the amended answer of the cross-defendants in toto.

This is the second appeal in this action, the first appeal having been reported as Joy v. Little, 134 Mont. 82, 328 P.2d 636. This action involves the rights of parties to a written contract for the sale of real estate and personal property.

Lee Joy and his wife Berniece, cross-complainants in this action, were the sellers and Forrest Little and his wife LaVon, cross-defendants in this action, were the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Casriel v. KingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  2. Boekelheide v. SnyderSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Silfvast v. AsplundMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Micheli v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1945
  5. La Salle v. La PointeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kovacich v. METALS BANK AND TRUST COMPANYMontana Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Daugherty Cattle Co. v. General Construction Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API